Do you hear that? That lady squeeing sweeping the land? That sound marks the arrival of Sex and the City 2, writer/ director Michael Patrick King’s homage to the films of the Depression era.
When asked about the film’s obliviousness to the current economic climate and decision to change the titular city, King has been saying that he took his cues from filmmakers who worked during the Great Depression, putting out movies provided that short, escapist vacation from grim reality.
(Except the same escapist, movie going experience would have cost about 5 cents in the Depression. Today, that same escapism is gonna cost you at least 9 bucks which, even adjusting for inflation, is outrageous. 5 cents in the Depression is about the same as 84 cents today. Nowhere near 9 bucks. Just sayin’.)
Recent reviews have called SATC2 dated, but I beg to differ. It’s dated only if one considers it to be standard chick flick fare.
I believe that Sex and the City 2 has switched genres – it’s now firmly in the realm of fantasy, right up there with Lord of the Rings, Pirates of the Caribbean, and The Neverending Story.
How so? Behold the evidence:
Mystical beings who don’t age as humans do – their skins are frozen in time, but their eyes. . . dear god, their dead, soulless eyes:
Costumes that are only socially acceptable in the world of the movie (or at conventions):
A companion guide book complete with a section detailing how you can re-create the costumes. That’s right, people. Sex and the City now comes with LARPing. Provided you have enough money, which you probably don’t.
Riding strange animals:
OK, so they’re camels, not oliphants or unicorns or Falkor, but they’re stranger than most of what we have in the Western world. Although, these camels do look a bit like Falkor in the face.
Exotic locales with names that won’t roll off the tongues of average Americans. I can say Abu Dhabi. I’m sure you can, too. But, we’re accustomed to saying things like “ Tatooine” and “Expelliarmus” and “ Silmarillion” without having to slow down and think about each syllable.
Must have objects: I’m not certain the plot involves one ring to rule them all or a sword in a stone or anything with genuine dramatic gravity, but there will be shiny things the ladies (sorry, I can’t legitimately call them “girls” anymore) must have, and by extension, the viewer will want. BTW, if Charlotte’s daughter parades around with another Judith Leiber clutch like she did in the first movie, I’ll wig out. Yes, it was cutely shaped like a cupcake, but giving a toddler a $3000 bag to carry is messed up.
And then, there’s Lilly, who pushes SATC2 right to the edge of horror with her portrayal of a”Creepy Little Girl”.
Lilly says:
“I’m the only Asian in this entire series who doesn’t give pedicures or otherwise serve these white heroines. I grow weary of being the visual shortcut that shows how progressive and open-minded these women are.”
Seriously. Look at this kid. Chin down, intent glare. She’s plotting the demise of them all.
Now that’s a movie I’d pay 84 cents to see.
Lisa Fary is a graduate of the creative writing program at Florida State University and holds an advanced degree in Special Education. Her earliest influences are Princess Leia, Rainbow Bright, Astronaut Barbie, and her 6th grade teacher, Ms. Palmer. She’s angry that it’s 2010 and she still doesn’t have a hovercraft, but will accept a jetpack as consolation. That jetpack had better be pink with a rhinestone monogram.
Related articles by Zemanta
- ‘Sex and the City’ Producer Heading Back to TV (tvsquad.com)
- Michael Patrick King talks about Sex and the City 2, Liza Minnelli’s role, and the Newsweek article (pinkbananaworld.com)
- SATC 2 Carrie Bradshaw’s Go-To Makeup (amominredhighheels.com)










![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=84a429b4-e385-4d4a-ad80-69a24987a3cf)






I love this interpretation!
I'm actually looking forward to seeing this. It will definitely be fluff and a little ridiculous, but these characters are fun. I loved the show, and I'm going to go w/some of my girlfriends and check out for two hours!
That's what it's all about. I was actually surprised by the first movie, too. I really liked it, and appreciated the fact that Samantha's most important relationship was with herself and not with Younger Dude.
I'm just glad there's a movie in which women Of A Certain Age can star and look pretty, PERIOD. There are so few opportunities for that, I CAN'T balk at Sex and the City.
I started watching the first movie again last night and – I admit it – I really like it. I loved the show, too.
HAH!
Hmm… interesting thesis. If I get roped into seeing this (unlikely, but it could happen if I sustain a head injury or something), I'll definitely keep it in mind.
Movies cost a lot to make, and most fail. Ticket prices need to be high. And ten bucks for someone's blood sweat and tears is not a lot.
I'm sure for some people it's not a big deal. But, in these hard economic times, $10 is a lot. So, guess what I don't do anymore? Go to the movies.
Six dollar tuesdays.
Yeah, I don't think six dollar Tuesdays is a nationwide thing. My local theaters don't have a deal like that. I've looked.
Well that does suck. Your theaters are lame.
I know, right?
$10. That's ADORABLE. Movies are $12.50 in NYC now. Ugh.
Brilliant!
Just saw SATC2 last night. Um, the script was horrible. BUT, it still managed to bring up some really interesting ideas about relationships and feminism, albeit in an extremely cheesy, overwrought context.
There was this one moment, though, that DROVE MY GRAMMAR WHORE SENSIBILITY CRAZY! Carrie is printing out the title of an article she's written for Vogue, and in the title is the phrase "The Terrible Two's."
I'll type it again:
"The Terrible Two's"
I didn't realize The Terrible Two was a supervillain duo and that something in your article BELONGS TO THEM, CARRIE! I don't know what annoyed me more, the fact that she's supposed to be a successful freelance writer who submits typos like that to Vogue, or that no one on the film caught that horribly annoying punctuation mistake.
Also, I didn't need to be subjected to Liza Minelli singing "Single Ladies" at a wedding. No, it wasn't funny. It was bad. No one deserves that.
Misuse of apostrophes is my Kryptonite. Wave "The Terrible Two's" or any handwritten sign from a Wal-Mart before me and watch me crumple to the floor. To finish me off, use "tookened" in a sentence.
Misuse of apostrophes is quite irritating, I'll admit, but my grammar Kryptonite is when people use words that aren't real words. Like "nu-cu-lar" or "irregardless". ::shudder:: My brother's best friend uses them just to watch me twitch, the sadist.
Also, you're just given me two more reasons not to see this movie — not that I needed more — poor grammar from a character who's a professional writer, and Liza Minelli.
Thank you! I thought that I was the only one to see that apostrophe! WTF? Doesn't the studio have someone to watch for things like that? C'mon, guys – she's supposed to be a writer!
( another word I've heard lately is "heighth" – as in width and heighth… it's like nails on a chalkboard to me )
I love this interpretation!
I’m actually looking forward to seeing this. It will definitely be fluff and a little ridiculous, but these characters are fun. I loved the show, and I’m going to go w/some of my girlfriends and check out for two hours!
That’s what it’s all about. I was actually surprised by the first movie, too. I really liked it, and appreciated the fact that Samantha’s most important relationship was with herself and not with Younger Dude.
I’m just glad there’s a movie in which women Of A Certain Age can star and look pretty, PERIOD. There are so few opportunities for that, I CAN’T balk at Sex and the City.