<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geeks Aren’t Friendly to Humans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/</link>
	<description>&#039;Accelerated decrepitude.&#34; - Pris, Blade Runner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:51:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32241</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32241</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Maybe because the network isn&#039;t run by chicks?&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 
 
But it was, not so long ago.  Bonnie Hammer used to be the president of SciFi.  Of course, she didn&#039;t seem to connect with or admit to the existence of female sci-fi fans, so maybe that&#039;s not the best example. 
 
Given how many of them I know, I find it very strange that women who like science fiction for the science part continue to fly under the radar.  I&#039;m not looking for a romance novel in space.  I want cool concepts and technology, dangit.  (As well as good characters, solid plots, and witty dialogue.  But I expect that from any series I watch, regardless of genre.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;Maybe because the network isn&#039;t run by chicks?&quot;</i> </p>
<p>But it was, not so long ago.  Bonnie Hammer used to be the president of SciFi.  Of course, she didn&#039;t seem to connect with or admit to the existence of female sci-fi fans, so maybe that&#039;s not the best example. </p>
<p>Given how many of them I know, I find it very strange that women who like <a title="science fiction" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/science-fiction/">science fiction</a> for the science part continue to fly under the radar.  I&#039;m not looking for a romance novel in space.  I want cool concepts and <a title="technology" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/technology/">technology</a>, dangit.  (As well as good characters, solid plots, and witty dialogue.  But I expect that from any series I watch, regardless of genre.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Mysterioso</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32237</link>
		<dc:creator>El Mysterioso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32237</guid>
		<description>Maybe because the network isn&#039;t run by chicks? They&#039;re second guessing. You know when you get a Major Kira character who&#039;s written by duded and she&#039;s supposed to be all empowered, but she comes off alternately like a man in a dress or a shrill harpie? That&#039;s because the guys writing her have no idea what empowered women are actually like in real life, and can&#039;t really be bothered to find out. This is the flip side of that: guys who have no idea what female viewers *Want* and can&#039;t be bothered to find out, so they&#039;re just going with the conventional wisdom that all they want is talk of relationships and meaningful glances.  
 
This from a network that can&#039;t be bothered to do the basic research required to find out that &quot;Syfy&quot; is street slang for a venerial disease, and textspeak for &quot;Screw you, F**k you&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe because the network isn&#039;t run by chicks? They&#039;re second guessing. You know when you get a Major Kira character who&#039;s written by duded and she&#039;s supposed to be all empowered, but she comes off alternately like a man in a dress or a shrill harpie? That&#039;s because the guys writing her have no idea what empowered women are actually like in <a title="real life" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/category/real-life/">real life</a>, and can&#039;t really be bothered to find out. This is the flip side of that: guys who have no idea what female viewers *Want* and can&#039;t be bothered to find out, so they&#039;re just going with the conventional wisdom that all they want is talk of <a title="relationships" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/relationships/">relationships</a> and meaningful glances.  </p>
<p>This from a network that can&#039;t be bothered to do the basic research required to find out that &quot;Syfy&quot; is street slang for a venerial disease, and textspeak for &quot;Screw you, F**k you&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IGPNicki</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32224</link>
		<dc:creator>IGPNicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32224</guid>
		<description>How is ECW friendly to female viewers exactly? Or, for that matter, how is it remotely related to scifi exactly? Somebody needs to tell the people over at the &quot;syfy&quot; channel that the way to get female viewers isn&#039;t to rebrand it. And it certainly isn&#039;t to give us Dallas in Space a la Caprica. I&#039;m a chick, and i&#039;m not afraid of a space battle, why the f%&amp;#k should the scifi channel be afraid? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is ECW friendly to female viewers exactly? Or, for that matter, how is it remotely related to scifi exactly? Somebody needs to tell the people over at the &quot;syfy&quot; channel that the way to get female viewers isn&#039;t to rebrand it. And it certainly isn&#039;t to give us Dallas in Space a la <a title="Caprica" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/category/on-screen/former-tv/caprica-current-tv-on-screen/">Caprica</a>. I&#039;m a chick, and i&#039;m not afraid of a space battle, why the f%&amp;#k should the <a title="scifi channel" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/scifi-channel/">scifi channel</a> be afraid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackpanther</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32210</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackpanther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32210</guid>
		<description>What is SyFy anyway?!  
 
And what everyone else said. They&#039;re trying to bring in more audiences, but getting rid of teh old ones won&#039;t really help at all.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is SyFy anyway?!  </p>
<p>And what everyone else said. They&#039;re trying to bring in more audiences, but getting rid of teh old ones won&#039;t really help at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32206</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32206</guid>
		<description>It makes me wonder who is doing their market research. Perhaps those people should be fired. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes me wonder who is doing their market research. Perhaps those people should be fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32203</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32203</guid>
		<description>Happy to oblige!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to oblige!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32204</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32204</guid>
		<description>Once BSG is done, there won&#039;t be a reason for me to tune in. ECW, Ghost Hunters, and asinine game shows just don&#039;t do it for me.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once BSG is done, there won&#039;t be a reason for me to tune in. ECW, <a title="Ghost Hunters" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/ghost-hunters/">Ghost Hunters</a>, and asinine game shows just don&#039;t do it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32202</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32202</guid>
		<description>Or, we&#039;re not &quot;real&quot; girls.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, we&#039;re not &quot;real&quot; girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32205</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32205</guid>
		<description>I know! It&#039;s like they don&#039;t realize that it doesn&#039;t matter what their branding looks like, it they don&#039;t produce good material, no one is going to watch.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know! It&#039;s like they don&#039;t realize that it doesn&#039;t matter what their branding looks like, it they don&#039;t produce good material, no one is going to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Mysterioso</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32201</link>
		<dc:creator>El Mysterioso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32201</guid>
		<description>This has been coming for a long time, though I&#039;d hoped when Mz. Hammer left the network things would have gone back to being  a bit more geek-friendly. Sadly, no, I guess not. (And why in the holy hell are they running TNG repeats anyway? What? Like there haven&#039;t been any SF shows in the last 20 years that haven&#039;t been as played out? I&#039;d rather see repeats of &quot;Space Precinct&quot; - a terrible show - than watch crappy, boring TNG again!) 
 
I&#039;d call for a boycot for the network, but of course that&#039;s not neccisary since they&#039;re boycotting their own fans.  
 
Though I&#039;m still interested in &quot;Stargate: Universe&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been coming for a long time, though I&#039;d hoped when Mz. Hammer left the network things would have gone back to being  a bit more geek-friendly. Sadly, no, I guess not. (And why in the holy hell are they running TNG repeats anyway? What? Like there haven&#039;t been any SF shows in the last 20 years that haven&#039;t been as played out? I&#039;d rather see repeats of &quot;Space Precinct&quot; &#8211; a terrible show &#8211; than watch crappy, boring TNG again!) </p>
<p>I&#039;d call for a boycot for the network, but of course that&#039;s not neccisary since they&#039;re boycotting their own fans.  </p>
<p>Though I&#039;m still interested in &quot;Stargate: Universe&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ancient_Immie</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-2/#comment-32196</link>
		<dc:creator>Ancient_Immie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32196</guid>
		<description>Very nice Lisa! 
 
Wow, its nice to know that no market research about your core audience ever took place in 10 years + that I&#039;ve been watching. That if you&#039;re Howe that you can always fall back on stereotypes (cause those are always true!) to justify your actions. If they want to change the name for copyright/trademark reasons then fine change, it but don&#039;t blame women or the &quot;dysfunctional&quot; or &quot;antisocial boys&quot; for it.  
 
I&#039;ve been watching SciFi for a long time and its not like the craptasitc movies of the week were ever a big draw for me. Most of the time those elicit an eye roll from me.  
What was a great draw for me were the great shows like Farscape, Firefly, Stargate, Forever Knight that pulled me in. But what the hell was the justification of bring the ECW on? Really? It still has me scratching my head as to how the hell that fits into their line up.  
 
I&#039;m not a BSG fan (yet, my friends keep telling me), but I am a Stargate fan and when they canceled SGA they lost some of my viewer ship. In defense of them canceling SGA, maybe if you could get some great writers we&#039;d all be watching SciFi/Syfy for the great original programing. The only thing on SciFi/SyFy that I&#039;m even remotely interested in still watching is Ghost Hunters and Ghost Hunters International. 
 
By the way a few words of advice to Howe, most &quot;women&quot; are not fans of wrestling (If you are a woman and a fan then yay for you! Its just not my cup of tea.). You might want to, I don&#039;t know, pull in shows like Charmed, Moonlight, Blood Ties, Highlander Raven, or True Blood. Bring back some classics like STNG, Voyager, Xena &amp; Herc. Start pulling from your parent network and run stuff like Heroes, or Psych from sister network USA. Here&#039;s a though find strong female lead characters and run with it! 
 
I know that this is SciFi/Syfy but also you might want to increase your Anime programming. There are lots of SciFi fans who love Anime! Not to mention most of Anime&#039;s sub-genres are all about the principles of SciFi. Your two hour block once a week during late night on a Monday(?) paired along the  merger Anime offerings of Cartoon Network&#039;s [adult swim] also in the wee hours of the early a.m. aren&#039;t enough! Its such shame that Anime Network went under you could have helped them out greatly.  
 
Sorry for the length of this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice Lisa! </p>
<p>Wow, its nice to know that no market research about your core audience ever took place in 10 years + that I&#039;ve been watching. That if you&#039;re Howe that you can always fall back on stereotypes (cause those are always true!) to justify your actions. If they want to change the name for copyright/trademark reasons then fine change, it but don&#039;t blame women or the &quot;dysfunctional&quot; or &quot;antisocial boys&quot; for it.  </p>
<p>I&#039;ve been watching SciFi for a long time and its not like the craptasitc movies of the week were ever a big draw for me. Most of the time those elicit an eye roll from me.<br />
What was a great draw for me were the great shows like Farscape, Firefly, Stargate, Forever Knight that pulled me in. But what the hell was the justification of bring the ECW on? Really? It still has me scratching my head as to how the hell that fits into their line up.  </p>
<p>I&#039;m not a BSG fan (yet, my friends keep telling me), but I am a Stargate fan and when they canceled SGA they lost some of my viewer ship. In defense of them canceling SGA, maybe if you could get some great writers we&#039;d all be watching SciFi/Syfy for the great original programing. The only thing on SciFi/SyFy that I&#039;m even remotely interested in still watching is Ghost Hunters and Ghost Hunters International. </p>
<p>By the way a few words of advice to Howe, most &quot;women&quot; are not fans of wrestling (If you are a woman and a fan then yay for you! Its just not my cup of tea.). You might want to, I don&#039;t know, pull in shows like Charmed, <a title="Moonlight" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/category/on-screen/former-tv/moonlight/">Moonlight</a>, <a title="Blood Ties" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/category/on-screen/former-tv/blood-ties/">Blood Ties</a>, Highlander Raven, or <a title="True Blood" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/category/on-screen/current-tv/true-blood-series/">True Blood</a>. Bring back some classics like STNG, Voyager, Xena &amp; Herc. Start pulling from your parent network and run stuff like Heroes, or Psych from sister network USA. Here&#039;s a though find strong female lead characters and run with it! </p>
<p>I know that this is SciFi/Syfy but also you might want to increase your Anime programming. There are lots of SciFi fans who love Anime! Not to mention most of Anime&#039;s sub-genres are all about the principles of SciFi. Your two hour block once a week during late night on a Monday(?) paired along the  merger Anime offerings of Cartoon Network&#039;s [adult swim] also in the wee hours of the early a.m. aren&#039;t enough! Its such shame that Anime Network went under you could have helped them out greatly.  </p>
<p>Sorry for the length of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR Pepper</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32195</link>
		<dc:creator>JR Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32195</guid>
		<description>Truly is ridiculous.. reminds me back a few years ago where everything had to be &quot; Xtreme&quot; 
 and apparently the myth if the female geek is still strolling around.  
 
Brilliant as always Lisa! :-D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly is ridiculous.. reminds me back a few years ago where everything had to be &quot; Xtreme&quot;<br />
 and apparently the myth if the female geek is still strolling around.  </p>
<p>Brilliant as always Lisa! <img src='http://www.pinkraygun.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliana Weiss</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32194</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliana Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32194</guid>
		<description>When I heard this news, the first thing I thought was, &quot;oh, Lisa is so gonna write an article skewering this asinine move. I can&#039;t wait!&quot; Thanks for delivering! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I heard this news, the first thing I thought was, &quot;oh, Lisa is so gonna write an article skewering this asinine move. I can&#039;t wait!&quot; Thanks for delivering!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrinityVixen</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32193</link>
		<dc:creator>TrinityVixen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32193</guid>
		<description>Prince did that to get out of his contract. So long as he wasn&#039;t &quot;Prince,&quot; he didn&#039;t have to whatever label it was claiming ownership of his music. At least, that&#039;s what the interwebs told me. Prince had a REASON. Sci-Fi has lame, insulting excuses. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prince did that to get out of his contract. So long as he wasn&#039;t &quot;Prince,&quot; he didn&#039;t have to whatever label it was claiming ownership of his music. At least, that&#039;s what the interwebs told me. Prince had a REASON. Sci-Fi has lame, insulting excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32191</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32191</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve heard, it&#039;s largely because they can trademark &quot;Syfy&quot;, but not &quot;SciFi&quot;, because sci-fi is a generic term.  The whole &quot;expanding our focus&quot; spiel is just a red herring.  They&#039;ve been doing that for years anyway. 
 
Also, I&#039;d like to show the network executives some convention photos.  A large portion of the audience -- often the majority for the &lt;i&gt;Stargate&lt;/i&gt; franchise -- is female.  There are a lot of perfectly &quot;normal&quot; people.  There are a lot of &lt;i&gt;families&lt;/i&gt;, a far cry from &quot;dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements&quot;.  David Howe and his team clearly still haven&#039;t gotten the message (After ten years?  Really?!) that sci-fi entertainment &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; becoming mainstream.  The stigma that they&#039;re so desperate to escape is disappearing from our culture.  And they&#039;re not going to avoid it at all if the new name &lt;i&gt;sounds exactly the same as the old name&lt;/i&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#039;ve heard, it&#039;s largely because they can trademark &quot;Syfy&quot;, but not &quot;SciFi&quot;, because sci-fi is a generic term.  The whole &quot;expanding our focus&quot; spiel is just a red herring.  They&#039;ve been doing that for years anyway. </p>
<p>Also, I&#039;d like to show the network executives some convention photos.  A large portion of the audience &#8212; often the majority for the <i>Stargate</i> franchise &#8212; is female.  There are a lot of perfectly &quot;normal&quot; people.  There are a lot of <i>families</i>, a far cry from &quot;dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements&quot;.  <a title="David Howe" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/david-howe/">David Howe</a> and his team clearly still haven&#039;t gotten the message (After ten years?  Really?!) that sci-fi <a title="entertainment" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/entertainment/">entertainment</a> <i>is</i> becoming mainstream.  The stigma that they&#039;re so desperate to escape is disappearing from our culture.  And they&#039;re not going to avoid it at all if the new name <i>sounds exactly the same as the old name</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreamrot</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32189</link>
		<dc:creator>dreamrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32189</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the name that keeps women from watching. A term like &#039;scifi&#039; isn&#039;t a barrier to many people. Sure, it has a certain connotation to it, but, at the same time...if you air quality shows, people will watch.  
 
Personally, I would imagine that ECW wrestling and the quality of their movies would be a bigger barrier, but what do I know... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the name that keeps women from watching. A term like &#039;scifi&#039; isn&#039;t a barrier to many people. Sure, it has a certain connotation to it, but, at the same time&#8230;if you air quality shows, people will watch.  </p>
<p>Personally, I would imagine that ECW wrestling and the quality of their <a title="movies" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/category/big-screen/movies-big-screen/">movies</a> would be a bigger barrier, but what do I know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32188</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32188</guid>
		<description>Lisa you and John have to write a SHOW!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa you and John have to write a SHOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaz</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32187</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32187</guid>
		<description>Most people  I know both male and female gave up on the SciFi channel when SG Atlantis was canceled. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people  I know both male and female gave up on the <a title="SciFi channel" href="http://www.pinkraygun.com/tag/scifi-channel/">SciFi channel</a> when SG Atlantis was canceled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32185</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32185</guid>
		<description>Thank God for the BBC, that&#039;s all I can say. At least over there they understand that just because it&#039;s newer, doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s better. The proof is in the pudding, as they say, and yeah, what the heck will they do once BSG is over? In spite of the name change, they won&#039;t have viewers if they can&#039;t come up with the goods. Or maybe they don&#039;t care what I think, since I&#039;m not a geeky boy.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God for the BBC, that&#039;s all I can say. At least over there they understand that just because it&#039;s newer, doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s better. The proof is in the pudding, as they say, and yeah, what the heck will they do once BSG is over? In spite of the name change, they won&#039;t have viewers if they can&#039;t come up with the goods. Or maybe they don&#039;t care what I think, since I&#039;m not a geeky boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkraygun.com/2009/03/18/geeks-aren%e2%80%99t-friendly-to-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-32183</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkraygun.com/?p=6006#comment-32183</guid>
		<description>As I said on Twitter, this is the most asinine name change since Prince changed his name to a symbol. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on Twitter, this is the most asinine name change since Prince changed his name to a symbol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

