Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
A review of Watchmen
By Sonia Aurora
Because I like to keep my nerd-geek street cred, it was imperative that I read the Watchmen tome before the film, to be able to revile or revel in what Zack Snyder and Co. translated cinematically. So I finished the graphic novel a few months ago, after owning it for about a year, having picked it up, put it down, picking it up again, and putting it down. I wasn’t sure what prevented me from reading it right away; I react like that to some things, where I hesitate, probably because some future self knows its going to impact me.
And it did, although to a certain degree I wonder if it would have impacted me more had I read it in 1986, although my 13 year old self would have been thrown and confused by it, I’m sure. I was still thrown and confused in 2008, but in a different way. After I’d finished it I told my sister (who loved it), “I’m not sure how I feel about it.” It took me about a week to fully finish chewing, swallowing and digesting it and as a whole I could respect it in a way you should respect masterpieces, appreciated it, understood it, but couldn’t wholly love it. It’s hard to embrace a bastard like the Comedian or a supreme being devoid of humanity (Dr. Manhattan). Surprisingly, like many, I loved Rorschach, our principle narrator, a vicious killer, but a man who believes in Justice at whatever cost. He tortures as he kills, but he addresses Evil with Evil. He is also black and white, and when the book reaches its climax, when he is faced the grey area, he becomes the book’s tragic hero.
The book is tragic, and heavy in all its philosophical elements. It forces you to think about the Grey Area, and reminds you how dirty a color grey actually is. It’s themes stayed with me a long time, and I wondered along with everyone else what would happen when we got to see Watchmen three-dimensionally, interpreted by Hollywood.
I tried to stay away from reviews, skimming them to get a general sense of thought without extracting too much detail and potentially spoiling something. Across the board, I read “faithful to the book to a fault.”
I have to agree. If you’ve read the book, the movie is the meat of it – the central story of Watchmen streamlined without the distraction of the excerpts richly interspersed. Tales of the Black Freighter, the comic in the comic is also gone (though to be included in the DVD among, I’m sure, a million more hours of extras). Essentially, we are presented with the bloodied, bruised heart of darkness.
Without giving too much away for those who haven’t read it, it’s good and it’s long. I came away from it feeling remarkably the same about all the aspects of it as when I’d read the book. Which I think honestly makes it a success. I was just as frustrated by Dr. Manhattan’s musings and presumed apathy, probably even more so with Billy Crudup’s soothing vocal delivery (he’s my sister’s favorite character, but I constantly wanted to hit him into submission to explain to him the worth of humanity, even in its failings). The Comedian as played by Jeffrey Dean Morgan was just as amoral, and I almost wanted more of him (sick as that may be). I was wary of Malin Ackerman as Silk Spectre/Laurie, but she while she didn’t impress she also didn’t disappoint. Nite Owl/Dan seemed a little better drawn out for me in the film, which I think is not only due to the writers but the depth Patrick Wilson breathed into him. Adrian Veidt/Ozymandias also irritated me as much as Dr. Manhattan, because of who the character is. Matthew Goode’s portrayal was so that I hated even more what Veidt came to do and what he presented. The injustice he commands at the end was no easier for me to swallow than it was on the page.
But, for me, Jackie Earle Haley as Rorschach was a revelation. He was everything I wanted the character to be, and more. While the ever changing ink blots of his mask bothered me at first, I came to enjoy it as that masked animation are his expressions. And admittedly I cried out in glee when he delivers my favorite line from the book in his growly, animalistic voice: “[You don’t understand]; I’m not locked in here with you; you’re locked in here with ME.” And at the end, when he faces the Grey Area, my heart broke a little as I believe his did.
I was shocked at the violence of it, though I admit it was necessary, and I felt the sex scene between two of the characters was too long to the point of being uncomfortable. While my friends later made fun of Dr. Manhattan’s “man junk” waving around all the time, again, it was true to its source and the symbolism of his detachment. In the end, I was disappointed in a way only because the ending was primarily the same as the book, and while I appreciate that it had to be, it made it no better that the state of that world – our world – could come to that still. Yet, in the last frame, at the last line, I did still feel a glimmer for Rorschach’s black-and-white justice. Yes, we can debate whether that is right or wrong or if you agree with Veidt and Dr. Manhattan – I still think that their philosophies and good intentions are crap because their own views are a different shade of black and white. If they had made honest sacrifices of themselves for the “greater good” I could have (maybe) sided with them. (OK, probably not).
I made a mistake in watching the film in Imax; I say “mistake” because while Imax is amazing, it is only truly amazing if you get the right seat. Otherwise, you’re sitting on the side and too close, as if you got stuck sitting in the front row of a regular movie theater, the faces too large and fast sequences distorted. I still felt visually captivated, but I know I was robbed of it a little too because I was at such an awkward angle.
The people in my group who weren’t familiar with the source came away with stunned looks; I could almost see the wheels in their heads still turning as they processed everything they had seen. They all agreed it was good, and that it was a lot to absorb. Those in the audience who came with knowledge applauded at the end, I think if for no other reason that it stayed true. Yes, I heard grumblings about what was left out (the fate of Hollis Mason being one) but for a movie almost 3 hours long, you have to cut it a break. I feel confident that a lot of light will be shed in the super-deluxe DVD that will come out by year’s end (if not sooner).
Overall, I suggest watching Watchmen. It forces you to think about Big Ideas, and that is never a bad thing. And ultimately, no matter what I think of the outcome, the book and film are much like a Rorschach ink blot – left to interpretation, and interpretation is neither right, or wrong.
*The Latin phrase is “who watches the watchmen?”; actually, literally translated it says “who has custody of the custodians?” But it’s the very last phrase at the very end of the graphic novel, standing alone.
Never miss an update. Subscribe to Pink Raygun by Email or subscribe via RSS
About Sonia Aurora: Aspiring screenwriter and seamstress, Sonia’s dream is to write life-changing films while product-placing her own line of handbags. In 1999, she wrote, co-directed and co-starred in the short film Dr. Lovestrange, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bug, a satirical homage to Stanley Kubrick set amidst the panic of Y2K (Featured on ifilm.com & Coming Soon to YouTube!). While Sonia waits patiently for the Studios to call, she continues her selfless, humanitarian efforts (think Mother Teresa) through her scripts, short stories and sewing (a true triple-threat!), knowing all the while that someday her efforts will indeed save (or at least mildly tweak) the world. She still struggles with which picture to kiss before bedtime: her boyfriend’s or Bruce Campbell’s. And, in the interest of time, she’d like to start thanking the Academy now.
|
|






Fantastic review! Very in depth and I enjoyed the perspective you brought to your commentary.
I've actually had the graphic novel in my possession since last summer, but chose not to read it until after seeing the film (I wanted to see the film on its own merits, without comparison to the source material) and what I find it interesting that your reaction to the graphic novel: "as a whole I could respect it in a way you should respect masterpieces, appreciated it, understood it, but couldn’t wholly love it." is pretty much how I felt about the film. And I agree … the more I think about it, the more Rorschach's character (and performance) stand out against the rest of the film.
Also, if you don't mind the conceit, here's my own review (from the perspective of someone who hadn't read the story before seeing the movie):
http://dauntlessmedia.net/film/watchmen-review.ht...
Fantastic review, Sonia – very well done.
I agree that both the graphic novel and the film take some digesting.
The reactions among the group I saw it with ranged from "Wow, that was great" to "I don't really need to see that ever again" and several degrees in between. Overall, I'm quite pleased with it as an adaptation. The degree of violence was a little surprising, even given the source material and the R rating, but at the same time it was completely in keeping with Alan Moore's starkly honest portrayals of human violence.
I think in order to truly appreciate both the book and the movie as two aspects of a single narrative, I'm going to have to go back and reread the graphic novel. Having the voice of Jackie Earle Haley in particular in my head will make Rorschach's dialogue that much more affective. And having all of the parts trimmed from the screenplay by necessity makes the story that much richer.
Did anybody else notice the abundance of Eureka actors in the movie? Both Taggert and Vincent popped up. Conspiracy? I think so… I think it's only fair that Fargo turn into Dr. Manhattan on the show.
Shit, Zane was in the Watchmen too. That's def a consiracy.
I'm in love with Billy Crudup's soothing voice. For real. He's a gorgeous man, too (I mean in the flashbacks).
I haven't read the graphic novel because Romania is a comicless country, but i have seen the film and i was unimpressed. The movie is too long and frankly, boring.
Even if hadn't read the novel i could tell the visuals were taken almost straight from the panels. Too much so. The movie drags on too long and i don't think the violence was necessary at all. Or at least not that much violence. The themes it tries to approach are interesting, but they have been done a lot better in a couple of other movies.
It was really hard to empathize with any of the characters who weren't much above the classic comic stereotypes. However Rorschach does stand out, both in performance and in characterization.
Not a movie i'd waste my time on again.
Hate to break it to you, but that happens with pretty much every movie and/or TV series filmed in Vancouver. The acting pool is much smaller than in Los Angeles, and there are tax incentives for hiring local talent. Plus, it's the hub of genre entertainment. The same faces show up a lot. Personally, I've turned it into a little game I like to call "Spot the Canadians".