You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “No Playboy Bunnies for DC Comics”.
3 Comments
Leave a Reply
Additional comments powered byBackType
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “No Playboy Bunnies for DC Comics”.
Additional comments powered byBackType
Nope, just the difference between fair use laws.
In other words, the Playboy cover, while identifying Tiffany Fallon as WW, did not use the current DC authorized version of the costume. So it could be used without DC’s permission as a parody.
However, if Cooke wanted to use the Playboy Club’s name and images in New Frontier, DC would have needed to get Playboy’s permission. Obviously they didn’t and heard from Playboy to make changes to the scene before it saw print.
No conspiracy, just the difference between a parody/homage and the use of someone else’s property.
So, Wonder Woman was visually sampled.
Hurm. Well, that was clearly Hef in the story, but I suppose as a real person, Hef is in the public domain?
I found that Darwyn Cooke story bizarre anyway.