No Playboy Bunnies for DC Comics

It seems as if Playboy is more protective of their babes than DC Comics is of theirs.

Comic Book Resources says:

“DiDio indicated the “New Frontier Special” nearly got him into trouble vis-a-vis some legal issues concerning a certain “bunny club,” alluding to Playboy.”

Curious.

So, Darwyn Cooke uses the bunny imagery to allude to a Playboy Club without identifying it as such and that causes some legal issues.

Yet, Playboy puts a nude model painted as Wonder Woman – and identified as such – on the cover of their February issue and DC doesn’t make so much as a peep, a whimper, or a chirp.

[nms:wonder woman,1,0]

Obviously, I don’t know the details of the legal issues DiDio mentioned, but there appears to be a disconnect between DC and Playboy and what’s considered acceptable use of their respective imagery.

Clearly, Playboy doesn’t consider Wonder Woman enlightening the male patrons of a Playboy Club via whacking them with her breastplate to be an acceptable use of their image (although it was pretty funny, and after the February Playboy cover, a fitting retribution).

What do you think?

Never miss an update. Subscribe to Pink Raygun by Email or subscribe via RSS

Related Stuff:

Power Balance Bracelet Black/white Letters Medium
Griffin Tempo Armband for iPod shuffle 2G (Light Gray)
THE PUNISHER - Marvel Comics - Car, Truck, Notebook, Vinyl Decal Sticker #1042 | Vinyl Color: White
Scalp Massager
Sunny Buick - Rose Sugar Skull - Sticker / Decal
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Article by Alpha-Girl

Lisa Fary's earliest influences are Princess Leia, Rainbow Bright, Astronaut Barbie, and her 6th grade teacher, Ms. Palmer. She's angry that it's 2011 and she still doesn't have a hovercraft, but will accept a jetpack as consolation. That jetpack had better be pink with a rhinestone monogram.
Alpha-Girl tagged this post with: , , Read 1744 articles by

3 Comments

  1. Nope, just the difference between fair use laws.

    In other words, the Playboy cover, while identifying Tiffany Fallon as WW, did not use the current DC authorized version of the costume. So it could be used without DC’s permission as a parody.

    However, if Cooke wanted to use the Playboy Club’s name and images in New Frontier, DC would have needed to get Playboy’s permission. Obviously they didn’t and heard from Playboy to make changes to the scene before it saw print.

    No conspiracy, just the difference between a parody/homage and the use of someone else’s property.

  2. philippos42 says:

    Hurm. Well, that was clearly Hef in the story, but I suppose as a real person, Hef is in the public domain?

    I found that Darwyn Cooke story bizarre anyway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered byBackType

Your ad could be here, right now.

Raygun Robyn's Store